2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2006 Ford E-350
To start off, 2006 Ford E-350 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1185 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (251 Nm). This means 2006 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 2006 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Colorado | E-350 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2769 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 12 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1671 kg | 2856 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 132 L |