2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2007 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2007 Jeep Commander is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 4,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jeep Commander (228 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1118 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jeep Commander (410 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (251 Nm). This means 2007 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 2007 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Colorado | Commander |
Year Released | 2005 | 2007 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 4699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 410 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 2305 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 14.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 80 L |