2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2008 Rover 45
To start off, 2008 Rover 45 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2008 Rover 45. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2008 Rover 45. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 5 kg more than 2008 Rover 45. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 45. (123 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 45.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 2008 Rover 45 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Colorado | 45 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 123 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1182 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 55 L |