2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2009 Ford Bantam
To start off, 2009 Ford Bantam is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 2,769 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP) has 101 more horse power than 2009 Ford Bantam. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 651 kg more than 2009 Ford Bantam. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Bantam. (110 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 2009 Ford Bantam | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Colorado | Bantam |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2769 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 110 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1671 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 54 L |