2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2010 BMW 120
To start off, 2010 BMW 120 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 2,769 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2010 BMW 120. (169 HP @ 6700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2010 BMW 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 286 kg more than 2010 BMW 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW 120. (210 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW 120.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 2010 BMW 120 | |
Make | Chevrolet | BMW |
Model | Colorado | 120 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2769 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 210 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 12.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1671 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 53 L |