2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 889 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 391 kg more than 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,060 Nm) has 809 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (251 Nm). This means 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Koenigsegg |
| Model | Colorado | CCXR |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2769 cc | 4719 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 1064 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 1060 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1671 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 18 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 22 L/100km |
