2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2012 Lincoln MKS
To start off, 2012 Lincoln MKS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Lincoln MKS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Lincoln MKS (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Lincoln MKS should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Lincoln MKS weights approximately 212 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Lincoln MKS (366 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (251 Nm). This means 2012 Lincoln MKS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 2012 Lincoln MKS | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lincoln |
Model | Colorado | MKS |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2769 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 366 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1671 kg | 1883 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5184 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1928 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1565 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2868 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 72 L |