2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2013 BMW X5 M
To start off, 2013 BMW X5 M is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 4,395 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 BMW X5 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW X5 M (547 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 372 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW X5 M should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW X5 M weights approximately 764 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 BMW X5 M (678 Nm) has 427 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (251 Nm). This means 2013 BMW X5 M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 2013 BMW X5 M | |
Make | Chevrolet | BMW |
Model | Colorado | X5 M |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2769 cc | 4395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 547 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 678 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 88 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1671 kg | 2435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4851 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2197 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1764 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2933 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 16.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 85 L |