2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2013 BMW X6 M
To start off, 2013 BMW X6 M is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 4,395 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 BMW X6 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW X6 M (547 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 372 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW X6 M should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW X6 M weights approximately 1228 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 BMW X6 M (678 Nm) has 427 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (251 Nm). This means 2013 BMW X6 M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 2013 BMW X6 M | |
| Make | Chevrolet | BMW |
| Model | Colorado | X6 M |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 4395 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 547 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 678 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 2415 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4876 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2195 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2933 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 16.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 85 L |
