2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE
To start off, 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE. (171 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE weights approximately 627 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE (353 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (251 Nm). This means 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Colorado | 200 CONVERTIBLE |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 353 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1814 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4947 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2089 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2765 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 11 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 64 L |