2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 98 kg more than 2013 Nissan Z.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Nissan Z (366 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (251 Nm). This means 2013 Nissan Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 2013 Nissan Z | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Colorado | Z |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2769 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 327 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 366 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11:01:00 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1671 kg | 1573 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4246 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1326 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 72 L |