2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2013 Volvo C70
To start off, 2013 Volvo C70 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 2,768 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo C70 weights approximately 178 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo C70. (236 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 2013 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Colorado | C70 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2768 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 236 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 93 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1573 kg | 1751 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4615 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |