2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1960 DKW Munga
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 550 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 1960 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
Model | Equinox | Munga |
Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 7.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 31 L |