2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1963 Holden EJ

To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 526 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.

Compare all specifications: