2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1965 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1965 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1965 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 1276 kg more than 1965 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 1965 Mazda R 360 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Equinox | R 360 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 3425 cc | 356 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 22 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 60 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 63 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 384 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 2990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 1770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 55 L |
