2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1966 Citroen Ami
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 1036 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 1966 Citroen Ami | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Equinox | Ami |
Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 602 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 7.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 624 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.4 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 25 L |