2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1967 Fiat Dino
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Fiat Dino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Fiat Dino would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1967 Fiat Dino. (160 HP @ 7200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1967 Fiat Dino. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 480 kg more than 1967 Fiat Dino. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Fiat Dino is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Fiat Dino. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Fiat Dino. (172 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Fiat Dino.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 1967 Fiat Dino | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Equinox | Dino |
Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 172 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 57 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 65 L |