2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1968 Volkswagen 1303

To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volkswagen 1303. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volkswagen 1303 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1968 Volkswagen 1303. (34 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1968 Volkswagen 1303. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 910 kg more than 1968 Volkswagen 1303. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 Volkswagen 1303 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volkswagen 1303. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volkswagen 1303. (84 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volkswagen 1303.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chevrolet Equinox 1968 Volkswagen 1303
Make Chevrolet Volkswagen
Model Equinox 1303
Year Released 2005 1968
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 3425 cc 1191 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 185 HP 34 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 3600 RPM
Torque 285 Nm 84 Nm
Engine Bore Size 92.1 mm 77 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 64 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 7.3:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 1660 kg 750 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 4070 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1560 mm
Vehicle Height 1770 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2410 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 40 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]