2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1969 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 7,442 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 405 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox.
Because 1969 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 1969 Chevrolet Impala | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
| Model | Equinox | Impala |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3425 cc | 7442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 2065 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3100 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 76 L |
