2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue weights approximately 695 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox.
Because 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Equinox | Camargue |
Year Released | 2005 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 104.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 99.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 2355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 107 L |