2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1977 Mazda 323
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 323. (44 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 848 kg more than 1977 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1977 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 323. (69 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 1977 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Equinox | 323 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 69 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 64 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 812 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 40 L |