2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1982 BMW 318

To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 318. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 318 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1982 BMW 318. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 318. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 640 kg more than 1982 BMW 318. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 BMW 318 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 BMW 318. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 318. (140 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 318.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chevrolet Equinox 1982 BMW 318
Make Chevrolet BMW
Model Equinox 318
Year Released 2005 1982
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3425 cc 1765 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 185 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 285 Nm 140 Nm
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 71 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1660 kg 1020 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 4330 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1770 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2580 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 55 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]