2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 790 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (90 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Equinox | Lancer |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1244 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 90 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 870 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2390 mm |
