2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1983 Mini MK V
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mini MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mini MK V would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1983 Mini MK V. (41 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1983 Mini MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 1035 kg more than 1983 Mini MK V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mini MK V. (70 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mini MK V.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 1983 Mini MK V | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
Model | Equinox | MK V |
Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 70 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2040 mm |