2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1987 Citroen BX

To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Citroen BX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Citroen BX would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1987 Citroen BX. (62 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1987 Citroen BX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 770 kg more than 1987 Citroen BX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Citroen BX. (110 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Citroen BX.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chevrolet Equinox 1987 Citroen BX
Make Chevrolet Citroen
Model Equinox BX
Year Released 2005 1987
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3425 cc 1360 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 185 HP 62 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 285 Nm 110 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.3:1
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1660 kg 890 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 4240 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1770 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2860 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.4 L/100km 11.9 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 80 L