2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1992 Fiat 126
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Fiat 126. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Fiat 126 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1992 Fiat 126. (26 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1992 Fiat 126. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 1012 kg more than 1992 Fiat 126. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Fiat 126 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Fiat 126. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Fiat 126. (49 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Fiat 126.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 1992 Fiat 126 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Equinox | 126 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 49 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 648 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1380 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 1850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.4 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |