2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1996 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota MR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota MR2 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1996 Toyota MR2. (173 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota MR2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 478 kg more than 1996 Toyota MR2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Toyota MR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Toyota MR2. (186 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Toyota MR2.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 1996 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Equinox | MR2 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 186 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.4:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1713 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 70 L |