2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1997 Acura CL
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura CL would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura CL (200 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. (185 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 133 kg more than 1997 Acura CL.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Acura CL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 1997 Acura CL | |
Make | Chevrolet | Acura |
Model | Equinox | CL |
Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 200 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1713 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 65 L |