2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotus Extreme. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotus Extreme would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (120 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus Extreme. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 1257 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Lotus Extreme. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (180 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | Equinox | Extreme |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 700 cc |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1713 kg | 456 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2420 mm |