2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Profile would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (206 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. (185 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 153 kg more than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (353 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. (285 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 2000 Oldsmobile Profile | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Equinox | Profile |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3425 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 206 HP |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1713 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2880 mm |
