2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2002 Proton 400
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Proton 400 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2002 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2002 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 690 kg more than 2002 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Proton 400. (108 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 2002 Proton 400 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Proton |
Model | Equinox | 400 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2510 mm |