2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2004 MG TF
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MG TF would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2004 MG TF. (158 HP @ 6900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2004 MG TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 470 kg more than 2004 MG TF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MG TF. (174 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 2004 MG TF | |
Make | Chevrolet | MG |
Model | Equinox | TF |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 174 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.4 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |