2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2008 Ferrari 360
To start off, 2008 Ferrari 360 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Equinox would be higher. At 3,586 cc, 2008 Ferrari 360 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 238 kg more than 2008 Ferrari 360.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Ferrari 360. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ferrari 360 (373 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. (285 Nm). This means 2008 Ferrari 360 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 2008 Ferrari 360 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ferrari |
Model | Equinox | 360 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 3586 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 285 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1713 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 370 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 17.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 95 L |