2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2008 Mazda DrifterX
To start off, 2008 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Equinox would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 133 kg more than 2008 Mazda DrifterX.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda DrifterX. (257 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda DrifterX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 2008 Mazda DrifterX | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Equinox | DrifterX |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 285 Nm | 257 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 21.6:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1713 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 13.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 80 L |