2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2011 BMW 320
To start off, 2011 BMW 320 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Equinox would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2011 BMW 320. (182 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2011 BMW 320.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 BMW 320 (380 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. (285 Nm). This means 2011 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 2011 BMW 320 | |
Make | Chevrolet | BMW |
Model | Equinox | 320 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4624 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1384 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 57 L |