2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2012 Citroen C3
To start off, 2012 Citroen C3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Equinox would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP) has 77 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C3. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 501 kg more than 2012 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C3. (147 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 2012 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Equinox | C3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 285 Nm | 147 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 78.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 1159 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 45 L |