2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2012 Proton Satria
To start off, 2012 Proton Satria is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Equinox would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2012 Proton Satria. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2012 Proton Satria. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 554 kg more than 2012 Proton Satria. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Proton Satria. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Proton Satria. (148 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Proton Satria.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 2012 Proton Satria | |
Make | Chevrolet | Proton |
Model | Equinox | Satria |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 148 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1713 kg | 1159 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |