2005 Chevrolet Express vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Express is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Express (195 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 1232 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Express (353 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Express | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Express | EJ |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2366 kg | 1134 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6210 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2090 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 2680 mm |
