2005 Chevrolet Express vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Express. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Express would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (464 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 269 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Express. (195 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Express. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 437 kg more than 2013 Dodge CHARGER.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (637 Nm) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Express. (353 Nm). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Express.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Express | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Chevrolet | Dodge |
Model | Express | CHARGER |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 464 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 637 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102.1 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 94 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2366 kg | 1929 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6210 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2090 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 3052 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 15 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 72 L |