2005 Chevrolet Express vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Express. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Express would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (301 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Express. (195 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Express. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 576 kg more than 2013 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Mustang (380 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Express. (353 Nm). This means 2013 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Express.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Express | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Express | Mustang |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2226 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1425 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 11.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 61 L |