2005 Chevrolet Express vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Express. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Express would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (345 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Express. (195 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Express. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 926 kg more than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lotus Evora (400 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Express. (353 Nm). This means 2013 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Express.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Express | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
| Model | Express | Evora |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 102.1 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 83 mm |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2366 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6210 mm | 4361 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2047 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2090 mm | 1229 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 2575 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 14.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 60 L |
