2005 Chevrolet Express vs. 2013 Volvo X670
To start off, 2013 Volvo X670 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Express. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Express would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 296 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 609 kg more than 2013 Volvo X670.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Express (447 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo X670. (441 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo X670.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Express | 2013 Volvo X670 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Express | X670 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5326 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 441 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2537 kg | 1928 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2815 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 12.1 L/100km |