2005 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Impala (240 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 507 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Impala | 1962 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
Model | Impala | Munga |
Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1617 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 31 L |