2005 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1963 Sunbeam Alpine
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 3,343 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Impala (181 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1963 Sunbeam Alpine. (81 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1963 Sunbeam Alpine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 507 kg more than 1963 Sunbeam Alpine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Impala (278 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Sunbeam Alpine. (126 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Sunbeam Alpine.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Impala | 1963 Sunbeam Alpine | |
Make | Chevrolet | Sunbeam |
Model | Impala | Alpine |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3343 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 278 Nm | 126 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 81.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 76.2 mm |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1537 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 40 L |