2005 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 3,343 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 962 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Impala (278 Nm) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Impala | 1965 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
| Model | Impala | 600 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3343 cc | 767 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 181 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 278 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1537 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2010 mm |
