2005 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1983 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 3,343 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Impala (181 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 657 kg more than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Impala (278 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Impala | 1983 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Impala | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3343 cc | 1486 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 278 Nm | 115 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1537 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2420 mm |