2005 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1991 Volvo 960

To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 3,343 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Volvo 960 (187 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Impala. (181 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Volvo 960 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Impala. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 7 kg more than 1991 Volvo 960.

Because 1991 Volvo 960 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Volvo 960. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Chevrolet Impala has automatic transmission and 1991 Volvo 960 has manual transmission. 1991 Volvo 960 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Chevrolet Impala will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: