2005 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2007 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2007 Holden Caprice is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 38 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Impala. (240 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 2007 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Impala (380 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Holden Caprice. (350 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Holden Caprice.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Impala | 2007 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Impala | Caprice |
Year Released | 2005 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 380 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.8 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |