2005 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2011 Suzuki Equator

To start off, 2011 Suzuki Equator is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Impala (240 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2011 Suzuki Equator. (150 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 2011 Suzuki Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 642 kg more than 2011 Suzuki Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2011 Suzuki Equator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Suzuki Equator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Impala (380 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Suzuki Equator. (171 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Suzuki Equator.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chevrolet Impala 2011 Suzuki Equator
Make Chevrolet Suzuki
Model Impala Equator
Year Released 2005 2011
Body Type Sedan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3786 cc 2501 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 240 HP 150 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 380 Nm 171 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1617 kg 975 kg
Vehicle Length 5090 mm 5250 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 3200 mm
Fuel Consumption 8.6 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.2 L/100km 15.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.8 L/100km 7.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 80 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]