2005 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 259 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Impala (305 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (279 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Impala | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
| Model | Impala | Roadster |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 279 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1514 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3758 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1391 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2467 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.8 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |
